Do we spend to much on defense? One liberal opines …
Behold the epic takedown:
“The United States is building Submarines and Carriers at a fairly constant rate over the same period”
Sub building rate is barely enough to maintain a minimum sized attack boat fleet, the LA boats are retiring faster than Seawolf is being built.
“while the military has had so many Ohio Class submarines that they had to give them dozens of cruse missiles to justify their continued use.”
The Ohio boats are reaching their end of life, a sub hull can make only a finite number of dives safely. The CGN’s were a way of utilizing boats that were rapidly reaching the age that they would no longer be fit for the boomer role.”
–CT in in the comments section of this article.: We Spend Too Much On Defense, By Gordon Adams, AOL Defense.
Yet another liberal chimes in with “millions for defense” bullshit. CT slaps him down nicely. Ever since the Clinton-era, the DoD has been starving. The Bush era brought an orgry of spending on Iraq, but that was a band-aid on a chest wound. I suspect that may libs WANT the US to fail.
This entry was posted on 18, July 2012 at 6:44 pm and is filed under politcs, rankers with tags anti-science, anti-war, Barack Obama, peace, war, wired is tired. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
