Thanks liberals. Somehow the military or rich Republicans will be blamed.
Archive for republicans
A civics lesson for the left:
Posted in politcs, rankers with tags change we can believe in, Change we need, college life, democrats, freedom of expression, gentleman rankers, left, lefttards, republicans, yes we can on 23, June 2012 by chockblockWhy the electoral college? Zo and Whittle take us to school:
Chew on this: The year isn’t even over yet.
Posted in guns, politcs, rankers, War On Terror with tags anti-war, change we can believe in, Change we need, chewy, chow tent at the end of the world, gentleman rankers, guns, guns go bang, left, lefttards, NSFW, politics, President Obama, republicans on 18, January 2011 by chockblockTasty links and a power to the people.
- Lefties may not stop after the President tells them to clam down.
- Gee thanks, Emergency Services to Suffer Under ObamaCare
- When you make a hero,make sure your “hero” is sane.
- Really lefties,really?
- Hey CNN, this ain’t the garden of Eden, this ain’t thesummer of love.
- Michelle Malkin, you are right again.
- Can the Air Force avoid the1990′s
- Don Surber is right on targetand Glenn Reynolds puts out firedoglake.
They want to believe
Posted in politcs, rankers with tags anti-science, anti-war, change we can believe in, Change we need, chow tent at the end of the world, freedom of expression, gentleman rankers, health care, health care reform, left, lefttards, politics, President Obama, republicans, universal healthcare, yes we can on 29, November 2009 by chockblockCharles Krauthammer on the Democrats health care proposal:
The United States has the best health care in the world — but because of its inefficiencies, also the most expensive. The fundamental problem with the 2,074-page Senate health-care bill (as with its 2,014-page House counterpart) is that it wildly compounds the complexity by adding hundreds of new provisions, regulations, mandates, committees, and other arbitrary bureaucratic inventions.
…
The bill is irredeemable. It should not only be defeated. It should be immolated, its ashes scattered over the Senate swimming pool.Then do health care the right way — one reform at a time, each simple and simplifying, aimed at reducing complexity, arbitrariness, and inefficiency.
First, tort reform. This is money — the low-end estimate is about half a trillion per decade — wasted in two ways. Part is simply hemorrhaged into the legal system to benefit a few jackpot lawsuit winners and an army of extravagantly rich malpractice lawyers such as John Edwards.
The rest is wasted within the medical system in the millions of unnecessary tests, procedures, and referrals undertaken solely to fend off lawsuits — resources wasted on patients who don’t need them and which could be redirected to the uninsured who really do.
We hear the endless droning of the MSM on how the US healthcare system is so unfair. We must give insurance to everyone! We must make it fair! Universal coverage!
Of course ask how this will be paid for and when you get past the usually soak the rich argument (and counter that taxing the “rich” who even begin to pay for “universal coverage”) and be prepared to hear crickets chirping.
Even Howard Dean admist that Republicans are right to try and kill this bill. Polls show that most are happy with the current health care.
Great Britain tired “universal coverage” and they are reaping what they sowed: Lower standards, “Poor nursing care, filthy wards and lack of leadership”.

If conservatives are accused of being heartless, liberals seem to revile in how much they appear to care. Wages too low? Raise the minimum wage. Despite what that does to the poor Social problems? SPEND! and SPEND MORE! Until the bill comes due and your state’s credit rating takes a hit. And taxes won’t help.
Caring is isn’t half the battle, it’s barely the start of the battle (unless you’re fighting a villain from a Saturday morning cartoon). We’ve had to endure decades of “caring” and “social welfare” until we spend more on entitlements than anything else. We listen to lawyers who say they “care” and now our laws are a hopeless jumble. Bad case laws, junk administrative law and regulations and junk statutes that line the pockets of big law firms. All for huge cash rewards that barely trickle down to the injured parties.
It’s time for rational thinking to take over. It’s time for less caring and more problem solving. We can solve this mess with out taxes, with out employing armies of lawyers. Government is not your parent, your caretaker or you doctor. It is raw naked force. The ax, the jail cell, the audit. Once people realize that they’ll stop clamroing for universial health care pipe dreams and start working on solutions.
Bringing the 9/11 plotters to the US: Galacticly Stupid
Posted in politcs, rankers, Uncategorized, War On Terror with tags anti-science, anti-war, change we can believe in, Change we need, chow tent at the end of the world, code pink, defense, democrats, flip flops, freedom of expression, gentleman rankers, hope and change, left, lefttards, not safe for work, NSFW, peace, politics, President Obama, republicans, War On Terror, wired is tired on 14, November 2009 by chockblockAh, justice. A matter for the courts right? Well if you jaywalk, crash your car while drunk or murder your lover yes.
But if you are the mastermind of a plot to kill 3,000+ innocent people in another country thousands of miles away and you are a danger to that country still, the courts may be in over their heads.
Tell that to the left and their drool supporters in the press. (h/t: Michelle Malkin)
Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be sent to New York to face trial in a civilian federal court, an Obama administration official said Friday.
The official said Attorney General Eric Holder plans to announce the decision later in the morning.
The official is not authorized to discuss the decision before the announcement, so spoke on condition of anonymity.
Terrorists hate our laws. They hide behind them to exploit the loopholes and clueless lefties that support them. Terrorism is NOT and never has been a criminal matter. It’s survival of the country, of the people. They want to kill as many Americans as possible.
If KSM is found innocent in the trial, does he go free? Why him? Others are getting military tribunals?
If the wacky anti-GITMO lefties are still not satisfied what then?
Are some in the administration playing politics with national security?
(h/t: Ace o’ Spades)
The continuing investigations of Bush-era counterterrorism policies (i.e., the policies that kept us safe from more domestic terror attacks), coupled with the Holder Justice Department’s obsession to disclose classified national-defense information from that period, enable Holder to give the hard Left the “reckoning” that he and Obama promised during the 2008 campaign. It would be too politically explosive for Obama/Holder to do the dirty work of charging Bush administration officials; but as new revelations from investigations and declassifications are churned out, Leftist lawyers use them to urge European and international tribunals to bring “torture” and “war crimes” indictments. Thus, administration cooperation gives Obama’s base the reckoning it demands but Obama gets to deny responsibility for any actual prosecutions.
….
Moreover, KSM has no defense. He was under American indictment for terrorism for years before there ever was a 9/11, and he can’t help himself but brag about the atrocities he and his fellow barbarians have carried out.So: We are now going to have a trial that never had to happen for defendants who have no defense. And when defendants have no defense for their own actions, there is only one thing for their lawyers to do: put the government on trial in hopes of getting the jury (and the media) spun up over government errors, abuses and incompetence. That is what is going to happen in the trial of KSM et al. It will be a soapbox for al-Qaeda’s case against America. Since that will be their “defense,” the defendants will demand every bit of information they can get about interrogations, renditions, secret prisons, undercover operations targeting Muslims and mosques, etc.,
That’s the real danger. National secrets exposed to defendants who want to destroy America, an international left that wants to drag the US government into pointless court cases. Both want to “prove” that any US actions in defense of the country and American citizens are “war crimes.” The results may come back to bite us.
What most people don’t get is that the Geneva Conventions do not cover “enemy combatants” that:
- hide in the civilian population
- do not wear uniforms or carry ID cards
- “Where in occupied territory an individual protected person is detained as a spy or saboteur, or as a person under definite suspicion of activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person shall, in those cases where absolute military security so requires, be regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present Convention.” Article 5 of the Geneva Conventions</li>
We should have executed these clowns when we had the chance.




