So there’s this guy, he things he’s smart. He writes a report,the paper picks it up and he waves around like a mad man.
Mr. Obama’s announcement of his new antimissile plan in September was based on the Pentagon’s assessment that the SM-3, or Standard Missile 3, had intercepted 84 percent of incoming targets in tests. But a re-examination of results from 10 of those apparently successful tests by Theodore A. Postol and George N. Lewis, being published this month, finds only one or two successful intercepts — for a success rate of 10 to 20 percent.
— Review Cites Flaws in U.S. Antimissile Program
By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: May 17, 2010, NYT.
But, the rest of the world see a lunatic who’s got his facts wrong.
The methodology of Postol’s “analysis”? Looking at the final — and I should note, UNCLASSIFIED — frame of the various SM-3 intercept videos released by MDA and determining that the center of that freeze-frame represented the precise intercept point (Postol’s graphic here). Sounds like rigorous rocket science, huh?
—Ted Postol: Aegis SM-3 Only 20% Successful; MDA: Postol Is 100% Full Of Shit, Closing Velocity.
Classified sensors are many, many times better than UNCLASSIFIED pictures. Many though that the Patriot system missed judging by TV images. But those images are captured at 60 frames per second. AVATION films use 500 fps. They captured hits.
Official US govt smackdown here.
Decoys: done and done (countermeasures are in place)
MIRVs: We test against them
Hit to kill: proven
AGEIS BDM, THAAD, Patriot, GMCD: made of win
Theodore A. Postol : made of fail
This man is an idiot and will be forgotten.
He should be made to apologize to the sailors who defend is right to be a nimrod.